you’ll laugh, you’ll cry, it’ll change your life

DIGGING HOLES AND FILLING THEM UP AGAIN

From Krugmans blog

Time for bottles in coal mines

President Obama hails the fact that stimulus projects are coming in “ahead of schedule and under budget.” Yay — but boo.

Ahead of schedule is good. Under budget — well, ordinarily that’s a good thing. But the point of the stimulus is to increase spending! So if we don’t spend as much as expected, that’s less stimulus.

Paging Keynes, who pointed out the problem with projects that are of some use besides their role as stimulus. Such projects

because they are not wholly wasteful, tend to be judged on strict “business” principles.

He then went on to propose an alternative:

If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing.

Seriously: if the projects really are coming in cheaper than expected, that doesn’t mean we should bank the savings; it means that we need more projects.

There is almost a recognition here of the difference between “currency movement” and production. There is still the belief that movements of small pieces of green paper are what makes people wealthy. Doing useful things is what makes people wealthy. The inability to see efficiency as value is ridiculous. If spending is all that is necessary than give everyone gift cards that have short term expiration dates. Why not propose that? Because it would expose the fallacy of spending as the economic engine. Creation (useful things, not just paper money) is what drives growth, not “spending”.

Advertisements

One response

  1. ryan

    What Obama is missing, is unless people who are not working, or not earning a income higher then their rent, the downward spiral won’t end. Demand will continue to dwindle, meaning more layoffs. meaning less demand and again more layoffs. Pay people to dig a hole an fill it again, they make money, spend money, demand rises.

    June 5, 2009 at 10:26 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s